A while ago, I wrote a critique of my friend Charles Amos’ position that there can be no libertarian case against open borders, suggesting that there could be.
Interesting discussion. But the point about rights of way surely is that they are places of transition on the way somewhere else. They don't admit you to anywhere. I can walk along the footpaths at Blenheim Palace anytime I like, but that doesn't mean I can live there. The equivalent of borders is the boundariy along either side of the right of way.
Interesting discussion. But the point about rights of way surely is that they are places of transition on the way somewhere else. They don't admit you to anywhere. I can walk along the footpaths at Blenheim Palace anytime I like, but that doesn't mean I can live there. The equivalent of borders is the boundariy along either side of the right of way.
The border on either side of a right of way is private property, so, the immigrant need only find a willing landlord to rent from and he is in.